In the evolving landscape of social media, one trend that has sparked debate recently is the phenomenon of “ghost tweeting.” Just as ghostwriting involves a concealed author penning for someone else, ghost tweeting entails multiple individuals tweeting from a single account.
What is Ghost Tweeting?
Ghost Tweeting is the act of allowing someone else, usually a hired individual or a team, to manage and post tweets on your personal or business Twitter account. This has recently gained attention, with well-known personalities and brands outsourcing their tweets to others.
The Ghost Tweeting Debate at SES Chicago
At SES Chicago, Abby Johnson ignited conversations surrounding this trend. Notably, a public figure admitted to hiring others to manage his Twitter updates, raising eyebrows across the social media community.
The immediate response? A barrage of criticism. Many argued that since the account carries a person’s name and image, tweets should authentically represent that individual. Accusations of unethical and insincere practices soon followed. The broader concern revolved around the authenticity of the content being shared.
The Case for Ghost Tweeting
However, the other side of the coin presents a different story. If one follows a personality on Twitter for the content they share, does it matter who’s behind the tweets? For instance, if you appreciate the links, articles, and ideas presented by an account, the actual authorship might be irrelevant.
A counterpoint frequently brought up is that followers of such accounts aren’t looking for personal friendships. They’re seeking engaging and relevant content. If the tweets resonate with the audience, who typed them might not matter.
The Ethics of Twitter Use
Discussions on Twitter ethics have grown louder. Yet, questioning the morality of tweets seems excessive for some. The primary objective for most Twitter users is to share interesting information or insights. If the tweets are engaging, the identity of the tweeter becomes secondary.
It’s crucial to note that various platforms and tools often evolve beyond their initial purpose. While Twitter may not have been designed specifically for marketers, its broad utility has made it a tool for a wide array of applications. For some, this evolution is a testament to Twitter’s versatility rather than a breach of its intended use.
Setting Expectations for Followers
Ultimately, the essence of the ghost tweeting debate lies in the expectations set by the account holder for their audience. If followers expect personal insights and updates, then the account holder should provide just that. But if followers are engaged with the content, irrespective of who tweets it, then ghost tweeting might be an efficient solution.
Where Do You Stand?
Ghost tweeting has stirred up the digital realm. But like many trends, its relevance and acceptance boil down to personal perspective. Whether you see it as a means to an end or a breach of trust, the debate continues.
Related Articles
