Skepticism abounds as the co-founder of Wikipedia plans to start a project fork of the anything-goes online encyclopedia with a new project that will abolish anonymous editing of topics and install topic experts to oversee the content.
Wikipedia has experienced significant growth, media scrutiny, and no small amount or controversy during its short lifetime. Wikipedia's benefit of anonymous editing has become a bane to plenty of people. It looks like Larry Sanger, Wikipedia's co-founder, perceived this in creating the wrote at TechCrunch that it's hard to take Citizendium seriously: I like variations on familiar models and the web 2.0 certainly isn't set in stone; but there are a number of reasons I'm very skeptical of Citizendium. t is reminiscent of the predecessor of Wikipedia, Nupedia - which Sanger was the editor in chief of just like he will be for Citizendium. Nupedia allegedly flopped under the weight of its PhD requirements, software inadequacies, the superiority of the wiki model in general and Wikipedia in particular. In other words, barring further information about Citizendium - it's hard to take it seriously. The project does have some stuffy backing for its snoozer of a text-only web site so perhaps it will prove viable. I'm not holding my breath. TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington differed with Kirkpatrick through a Arrington also noted that Wikipedia's entry about TechCrunch has a number of errors, which he won't even think about trying to fix. "The wikipedia community has completely intimidated me to the point where making a change to that site is unthinkable," he wrote. Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Yahoo! My Web | Furl Bookmark Murdok: David Utter is a staff writer for Murdok covering technology and business.Citizendium Forks Wikipedia
1 views
Comments (0)
Please sign in to leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!