At the New Communications Forum last week, pretty much everybody agreed that blogs were no fad, but wikis evoked a less enthusiastic response. Some conference participants shrugged them off as too technical and complex for the average user. Even Wikipedia is revised most frequently by a relatively small group of regulars. Nobody argues that wikis make it easier to generate web content than working in HTML or a web authoring app like Dreamweaver. All that's missing from wikis to get people using them is real motivation. A company called WikiFido one of the community wikis Wetpaint has created. Here, you can add your $.02 to community-written topics like becoming a dog owner, dog breeds, puppy training, taking care of Fido and a list of dog resources. You can also add your dog's picture to the "My Dog is Cuter than Your Dog" or "Ugliest Dog" pages. WikiFido is just one of the wikis Wetpaint has set up. According to a Seattle Post-Intelligencer article, Wetpaint's other wikis cover cancer, the XBox 360, Democrats, Republicans, and bird flu. According to the article, the venture capital-backed company operates under a principle that will be familiar to blog readers:
The most important concept behind Wetpaint is the idea that groups of people working together and sharing information can create more compelling online content than individuals. In other words, two dozen poodle owners will have more interesting things to say than just one. Wetpaint dubs this the "collective wisdom of crowds."I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if WikiFido takes off. I would think the XBox and cancer wikis would also have great chances for success, given the numbers of people with intense interest in the topic and the belief that they have knowledge to share. My only regret is that a startup came up with these ideas instead of a company. Why shouldn't Purina have created WikiFido? Why couldn't Merck establish DiggThis | Shel Holtz is principal of a shel of my former self
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!