Daring Danny Duels with Diggers

Yesterday, Danny Sullivan posted an interesting response to Jason Calacanis’ latest potshot at the search engine optimization industry. Basically, as he’s been prone to do in the past, Calacanis ripped SEO. He said that it was 90% snake oil salesmen and warned the Internet populace in general not to smoke the SEO crack. Then he got nasty…

Danny VS. Digg? Danny’s reply to Calacanis though scathing at times, did a fair job of defending the legitimacy of the SEO industry.   Where Calacanis had used half-baked imaginary statistics to fuel “90%” of his claims, Danny had relied on reason and real life examples. He cited several examples of good SEO practices and used a number of Google statements as ‘character references’ for the industry.

Where Calacanis ranted –and indeed at times I felt as if I could almost hear him screaming his words through the screen at me (and I’m not even an SEO), Danny’s tone was much more levelheaded and reserved. Now, in all fairness, the latter view may have been biased by the fact that I have personally spoken with Danny on several occasions and just know what he ‘sounds’ like. My interactions with Calacanis have been limited to hearing him speak – most recently at the now-infamous Chicago SES where, in a brilliant display of diplomacy and wisdom, he told a room full of SEO professionals their work was ‘bullshit’.

Nonetheless, let’s just say I thought Danny did very well -until his post got Dugg. Danny’s post eventually found it’s way to Digg where he was summarily attacked from all sides. Much to my amazement, Danny waded into the bloody waters of Digg and actually attempted to rationalize and explain things to the Diggers. Now, I have followed Digg for some time. I figure Danny has too, as such, I can only assume Danny had to have some idea of what he was getting into.  Which made his attempt to actually conduct some sort of rational dialogue there all the more mysterious to me.

One Digger went so far as to accuse Danny of a “nasty attempt to build pathos using women as your crutch”. The basis for this accusation? In response to Calacanis’ charge that “90% of SEOs were snake oil salesmen”, Danny had said “the vast majority of them were not snake oil salesmen -- or women, for that matter. SEO has a huge number of women working in it let's not forget.” – And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the Digger equivalent of using women as a crutch.

There was no shortage of gems amongst the Digger responses. “Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is a euphemism for link spam in -all- cases.” In -all- cases even. No ifs ands or buts… -all- cases. Danny actually gave this fellow a 2-paragraph reply citing Google’s take on SEO. Danny needs to go to Amazon and get a new copy of -all- cases, but I feel pretty comfortable saying the Beavis and Buttheads substantially outnumber the Vint Cerf’s of Digg-nation.

How can I make such an outlandish claim? Well, a couple of weeks ago, after Lee Odden was unceremoniously (and undeservedly) exiled from Digg, I decided to take a closer look at ‘the Digger’. What were his (gender neutral) likes, his dislikes… what kinds of things did he Digg etc…

Is your average digger an angst ridden 19 year old nerd... or is your average digger actually representative of the internet’s upper crust intelligencia.

Well, let’s count the digs.

Let’s take a look at some of the highest dugg items from the past 30 days. Remember this was about a month ago, so the numbers of Diggs have no doubt increased but the Digg count I list is where they were at the time.

You have: Geek Squad .. SUCKS! ... Here we have 5,194 Diggs for undercover cameras apparently busting GeekSquad for some sort of repair misdiagnosis/over billing shenanigans.

And rounding out our top 5 (at the time) we had:

To the women who work in my office... I hate you  -  4,703

Suggest a Correction

Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.

Your Name *

Your Email *

Correction Details *

Submit Correction