OK, the subject of this post should read: "Proclaiming something to be dead is dead." But I figured this headline might raise more ire. The gimmick of proclaiming the death of one industry, discipline, technique or technology due to the creation of another is just asking for it. When people claim is dead, when they claim anything is dead for that matter, I laugh. It shows a complete oversimplification and misunderstanding of what we do so they can place their related field on a pedestal. B.L. Ochman this article by David Daniels. RSS' effect on e-mail marketing makes the point that e-mail marketing is not dead. OK, based on the penetration of RSS to date, that's accurate. Not to mention, each technology has pros and cons. It is really your goals, objectives and target audience that should drive your choice of one over another. But Daniels makes himself the poster child for "you're wrong" follow-up posts with the following statement: "RSS provides opportunity, particularly for newsletter publishers, but let's not kid ourselves. As it's repurposed for more direct marketing initiatives, it won't be a smooth, clutter-free ride. As e-mail marketers, we can relax. This technology won't seriously compete with our channel, so we can focus on what we need to: making e-mail marketing more relevant!" Something tells me Strategic Public Relations blog. Kevin is Director of Marketing Communications for Strategic Public Relations
E-Mail is Dead, Long Live RSS
0 views
Comments (0)
Please sign in to leave a comment.





No comments yet. Be the first to comment!