Organizing all the world's information may be a noble goal, but a couple of prominent blog voices wonder if past security concerns could bode poorly for adoption of Google applications. "They are more like us than anyone else we have ever competed with." -- Bill Gates on Google, from a 2005 Fortune Magazine interview
TechCrunch speculated on what could possibly go wrong in the Google-centric model: The fact that unauthorized document access is a simple password guess or government "request" away already works against them. But the steady stream of minor security incidents we've seen (many very recently) can also hurt Google in the long run. Running applications for businesses is serious stuff, and Google needs to be diligent about security. Google product teams work in cells, which allows them to quickly launch and iterate products. However, there could be a disadvantage to this as well with regard to security, as their does not seem to be one central policy or security group ensuring strict compliance across the entire company. It would be odd, in the age of Sarbanes-Oxley, for Google not to have a formal security policy that is uniform to their operations in place. I've written a small number of policy and procedure documents in my previous techie life, and conformity to make SOX auditors happy was very much the driving concern for that joyous assignment.Suggest a Correction
Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.





No comments yet. Be the first to comment!