A case of patent infringement against Google ended up being dismissed by a federal judge in Wisconsin.
Accusations that Google's AdSense and AutoLink technologies infringed on four patents held by Carlos de la Huerga and his company, HyperPhrase, found no favor from US District Judge John Shabaz. The judge's 25-page Considering the AdSense product, there are two records involved in the process: the web page and the advertisement. However, to suggest that either of these records "refers" to the other is nonsense. Web advertisements are prepared in isolation from and, in most instances, prior to the web articles are written. It is inconceivable that the advertisement would contain a "reference" to the article. It is equally inconceivable that the web page would contain a reference to the advertisement.
In the case of AutoLink, Google's technology for creating a link to UPS when one of its tracking numbers appears on a web page for example, the court found that AutoLink did not infringe "because its process does not involve references to second records and does not involve common address formats as required by the patent claims."
De la Huerga's patents involve the storage and retrieval of medical records. To Shabaz, the patents are limited to medical records retained as electronic documents. "The unmistakable meaning of these terms is that there be a reference to a single, specific record which the created link retrieves," he wrote.
An AP
Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.
Suggest a Correction
Google Wins In Court Again
0 views
Comments (0)
Please sign in to leave a comment.





No comments yet. Be the first to comment!