Have you read the Catalyst Group study about blog usability call Net Rage? If not, you should. Those of us who spend inordinate amounts of time using these things, evangelizing, and otherwise doting over them seem to forget (at least I do) that most people still don't have a clue as to what a blog is or how they should react to it. In fact, most people probably could care less. They just want information.
WebProWorld David Coursey has series on the future of blogging, Allbusiness.com with my Coursey's columns where he intones that blogs (along with RSS and podcasts) will become so melded into the warf and woof of the internet these odd sounding names won't really be of consequence. Though the names lose their ubiquity, the technology won't. Blogs become just another form of content publishing, albeit one with a certain "style" and set of unique features. RSS becomes simply a way to subscribe to content and organize the web. Podcasts become a way to transmit audio/video. Speaking from a purely technological standpoint, that's what they already do. It's just that we've become our own worst enemies by putting so much emphasis on the nomenclature, we've ostracized ourselves from the average internet user. (Maybe we ARE a cult!) Coursey intimates that the term RSS will be replaced with the word "subscribe." Blog "posts" will be called "articles" and so on. It is the technology that's important, and how well it serves mankind, not what you call it. This goes back to my assertion that we early adopters get very giddy about new tech toys, and things like blogs, RSS, podcasts and wikis certainly fire our jets. But to the "common man" the real issue is not what you call these tools, but how well they serve to scratch their itch in providing needed information. Thanks to the likes of Yahoo! and MSN, the technology is becoming accessible and recognizable. So, maybe I'm fretting over nothing. It takes time for transition to occur. But, that transition won't be so much in the direction of people adapting themselves to the technology as the technology adapting itself to people. (Does that make sense?) One of the best examples of this is what I see happening with the new blog "channels." Take for example Allbusiness.com. They have a well-established, highly-trafficked website that provides great value to readers, and has for years without the presence of blogs. Now, they've incorporated a- I am expecting blogs (and Podcasts, for that matter) to be all the rage until some moment when, almost as though a switch had been flipped, they don't seem so exciting anymore.
- Blogs and "traditional" media will share so much DNA that whatever differences once existed will no longer be apparent.
- What may end up differentiating blogs from traditional Web media won't be technology as much as style.
- Successful blogs will be about something, just like successful magazines, newsletters, columns and other written media. Don't get me wrong, I love everything about blogs, their search-engine friendliness, their "shoot-from-the-hip" spontaneity, their world "live" web feel, and the ease with which they allow anyone to publish their thoughts and ideas instantly. However, thinking long-term it makes sense to think that blogs, RSS, and podcasts will become blended into the overall matrix of online content. Let's keep the main thing the main thing and express a willingness to admit that the usefulness of the technology is what's really important, not what we call it. Radiant Marketing Group, a web design and marketing agency geared to meeting the needs of small business. He has been involved web design and marketing since 1997. Currently, he spends most of his time blogging about Internet marketing.





No comments yet. Be the first to comment!