How to Judge a Good Website from a Bad One

Key Indicators of a High‑Quality Website

When you land on a site, the first few seconds decide if you’ll stay. A strong website feels familiar, offers instant context, and lets you jump where you want. Good sites do more than just look pretty; they arrange their pages so that every link feels logical and purposeful. That logic is a reliable sign that the site is built for people, not just for search engines.

First, navigation should feel natural. If you’re looking at a page about a product, a clear link to “Case Studies” or “Testimonials” appears, not an unrelated banner or a hidden dropdown. The path from home to a niche topic should take no more than two clicks. Think of Amazon – when you search for a kitchen appliance, the results list immediately offers filters, reviews, and “Buy Now” options. Those links appear in the same place every time, making the experience predictable.

Second, content is linked in a way that matches the user’s intent. A website that talks about its share prices will provide a direct link to a “Financials” page or a downloadable PDF. The description in the header should not read “You’ll find the share prices here”; it should simply say “Share Prices” and let the user click. This clarity removes guesswork and speeds up decision‑making.

Third, the site’s internal linking hierarchy reflects its information architecture. Top‑level sections like Services, Clients, and Press should each contain sub‑sections that nest logically. When a reader lands on a Services page, the next links they see should be related services, industry‑specific use cases, or case studies that demonstrate the benefit. If the Services page merely lists all clients in a single scroll‑through table, the structure feels chaotic and unhelpful. A well‑thought‑out hierarchy reduces cognitive load and keeps visitors engaged.

Fourth, consistency is key. The same terminology appears across the site. If you call a product “Smart Oven” on the home page, you shouldn’t refer to it as “Intelligent Stove” in the FAQ. Inconsistent labeling leads to confusion and erodes trust. Many government sites fall into this trap; for example, the New Zealand State Services Commission lists its responsibilities in a paragraph that reads like an abstract, then hides the actual responsibilities under a “More” link that never arrives. A clear, direct link to Gerry McGovern

Subscribe to his New Thinking Newsletter: