If you Can't Measure it, you Can't Manage it

Why Intranets Fall Flat Without Structured Governance

When an organization launches an intranet, many people expect it to transform the way knowledge flows inside the company. In practice, most intranets grow organically and end up as chaotic repositories of documents, spreadsheets, and announcements that are hard to find and difficult to use. The core problem is that intranets don’t self‑organize. Without a deliberate, centralized architecture and clearly published processes, they drift toward disorder and lose the business value they were meant to deliver.

At the heart of a functional intranet is a set of well‑defined content rules. These rules dictate where information lives, who can add or edit it, and how it is presented to the end user. When those rules are missing, the intranet becomes a collection of disjointed tools that no one trusts or uses. Users turn to colleagues, face‑to‑face conversations, or ad‑hoc email threads to get the information they need, which defeats the purpose of having a digital platform in the first place.

IBM’s journey illustrates this dilemma in stark detail. In the mid‑1990s, the company was operating more than 7,000 separate intranet sites, each built by different departments or business units. Employees were asked annually how they located the information required for their daily work. The first answer was always “other colleagues.” When the corporate intranet was introduced, it slotted to the bottom of the list because it was not integrated into the way people actually worked.

Recognizing the fragmentation, IBM decided to consolidate its digital footprint into a single, cohesive intranet architecture. The company introduced formal publishing controls, standardized templates, and a central governance body that enforced content ownership and lifecycle rules. The following year’s survey showed a dramatic shift: employees now rated the intranet as the number one source for information. The change was not accidental; it was the result of deliberate policy and disciplined execution.

The success story points to a single feature that many intranets overlook: the staff directory. When employees search for a colleague’s contact details, they expect instant, accurate results. Unfortunately, the most common issue with staff directories is that they are outdated. An obsolete directory is not just an inconvenience; it erodes trust in the entire intranet ecosystem.

To avoid that fate, organizations should stop treating intranet content as static data. Instead, they should adopt a publisher mindset - think of the intranet as a newsroom that curates, edits, and delivers content to the right people at the right time. Publishers routinely update their content, monitor reader engagement, and adjust stories based on feedback. By applying the same principles, intranet managers can ensure that critical information like the staff directory remains current and useful.

Personalization is a tempting feature, and it can dramatically improve user experience. However, it should never replace the foundational requirement that the content itself be accurate. Before layering sophisticated personalization algorithms, an intranet must first establish a clean, well‑structured knowledge base. A “crawl, walk, run” approach - starting with basic search and navigation, moving to role‑based views, and finally to dynamic, context‑aware content - helps prevent the paralysis that often follows the launch of a highly personalized intranet.

In short, the failure of many intranets boils down to a lack of governance, outdated content, and an overreliance on informal data management practices. By shifting to a publisher model, implementing rigorous content controls, and prioritizing accurate, timely information, organizations can turn their intranets from a nuisance into a strategic asset.

Turning Intranet Management Into a Data‑Driven Process

Even though intranet technology has matured, the practice of measuring its performance remains surprisingly underdeveloped. A November 2003 study by Prescient Digital found that intranet ROI calculations were still largely guesswork for most organizations. Jakob Nielsen’s article, “Ten best intranets of 2003,” highlighted the lack of detailed usability metrics, noting that teams were more focused on delivering content than on justifying its existence.

The saying “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it” rings true in this context. Many intranets operate without basic analytics: page views, time on page, search query success rates, and user satisfaction scores. Without these metrics, stakeholders have no way to assess whether the intranet is truly adding value. Worse, some managers have no idea how many pages exist on their intranet, let alone how many separate intranets the company hosts.

This ad hoc approach is unsustainable. As senior executives demand clearer evidence of digital investment returns, the lack of measurement becomes a compliance risk. A company that cannot prove its intranet’s contribution to productivity or cost savings risks losing support and funding for future upgrades.

To meet these expectations, intranet managers must develop robust ROI models. Start by asking hard questions: if the intranet were shut down tomorrow, would the organization become less productive or more productive? Would employees revert to outdated workarounds, or would they adapt quickly to alternative tools? The answers to these questions will reveal the intranet’s real value proposition.

Building an ROI model involves more than tracking clicks. It requires linking intranet usage to business outcomes: reduced time spent searching for information, faster project turnaround, improved collaboration, and lower support costs. Tools like web analytics, user surveys, and performance dashboards can provide the data needed to quantify those benefits.

Adopting a data‑driven mindset does not happen overnight. Success stories such as Tetra Pak demonstrate that meaningful change requires a long‑term, five‑year plan. Rather than focusing on quick fixes, organizations should invest in a sustained governance framework that balances technical capability with people management. Engaging users, establishing clear ownership for content, and promoting a culture of continuous improvement create the conditions for intranet success.

In practice, this means setting up a governance committee that includes representatives from business units, IT, and HR. The committee should define content lifecycle policies, approval workflows, and performance metrics. It should also monitor adoption rates and solicit feedback from users on a regular basis. Over time, the data collected will inform decisions about feature enhancements, training programs, and budget allocations.

When measurement becomes ingrained in the organization’s DNA, intranet managers can shift from reactive maintenance to proactive optimization. They can identify underused content, streamline navigation, and personalize experiences in ways that truly support business objectives. The result is an intranet that not only delivers information but also drives measurable improvements in productivity and employee engagement.

Subscribe to his New Thinking Newsletter: