I have been receiving emails and comments about yet another PageRank downturn for multiple sites.
Simple Kind of Life and Search Engine Round Table and Emom andMeanwhile Matt Cutts is playing around with negative views of the blogosphere regarding Google.
Meaning Of PageRank Unchanged
Google have had more than a month to change the
I haven't seen any change to Search Engine Rankings and there is still no way to request reconsideration without admitting guilt.
The Webmaster Help Center also doesn't give an option to report that you think Matt notes that you can still be in the index even though you have a penalty, which he updated November 4th 2007
I did find something cool though which I hadn't seen before, maybe I missed it being reported, or didn't pay much notice.
I am still being crawled frequently and there are some interesting spikes. It is a pity that the graph doesn't line up with the scale.
From January people using PayPerPost SocialSpark Alpha screenshots do still have PageRank listed, and that will likely be removed totally unless Google change their stance.
real expert in SEO, who based on the links he receives should be a comfortable PR4, or possibly a PR5, affiliate marketers like Vlad who may have written a couple of high quality reviews, and sold some advertising.At the same time he also is an affiliate with some affiliate services which offer SEO friendly "clean links" for their merchants.
For a website owner they are still links from which they will be making money, though the money from affiliate marketing is variable - the links still affect search engines, as do many other affiliate links which feature 301 redirects.
Now whilst issues might be appeased as a result of the Aaron hasn't been lynched
To finish I am just going to steal the words of Matt's Reporting On Paid Links post
Honestly, Matt… and if your legal team won’t let you answer this, then I understand, but if you are allowed to answer then I (and I’m sure others) would really, really like to know… as the G algo stands now, exactly how much off balance would you say it is due to the insidious act of buying and selling text link ads? How many man hours have you spent combating this crime against humanity, and at what cost? And is it seriously skewing the results that much, that all the efforts spent on it were, and continue to be, justified? Is the algo that fragile? The other main reason that I disagree with this idea is that you think (or appear to be implying, anyways) that Paid Link === No Human Review. This not the case 9 times out of 10. You should know that.
An official statement finally from Izea (PayPerPost) on their blog I would like to thank Ted (CEO of Izea) for having the courage to say something about this in public, something it seems Google so far have not managed to do, and rarely do so on an official company blog. Lisa Stewart of decision process on the PayPerPost boards that ultimately led to Ted Murphy making a statement.
Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.
Update - Official Statement From Izea (PayPerPost)
Suggest a Correction
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!