Search

Open Source Advertising Not Necessary?

0 views

Okay, here's another one of Dana's stories that I take exception to. Note that I respect Dana's writings and I read his blog daily. In ZDNet's Dana Blankenhorn, he says:

One of the big stories for 2007 is going to be the battle between marketing and reputation..You don't see a lot of high-cost advertising from companies like before, but I'll cut & paste it again: Company Ad spending
as % of
Total Rev SG&A to
R&D SG&A as
% of
Total Rev Source IBM 1.4% 3.6x 23% Fiscal year 2006 Oracle 0.7% 2.0x 26% Red Hat 4.6% 3.1x 54% [Note: To find Advertising spending, do a "CTRL-F" search for the word "advertising" in the above SEC filings. The data is included in text, and not usually in a nice table format in the filings.] So, whether or not Red Hat is putting out a lot of "high-cost advertising" or not, they sure are spending their fair share (and then some) on advertising. It should also raise a few eyebrows that Red Hat SG&A spending is such a large % of their total revenue. Yes, if we looked at absolute Ad spending, Red Hat would be spending far less than the others ($4.2M vs. $1.284B for IBM) on Advertising. But it doesn't make sense to look at absolute figures when revenues differ so much amongst the group. Hence the need for a proportional analysis. Now, here's what gets me. It took me 20 minutes to pull this data together when I first posted it and another 10 minutes to get the Ad spending data today. Why couldn't Dana (or Matt in Have we all had too much of the Kool-Aid? We (the collective open source supporters) need to present analysis based on facts rather than "obvious truths" if we are to appear credible to those who don't gork the value of open source just yet. blog about enterprise open source topics.

Suggest a Correction

Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.

Share this article

Comments (0)

Please sign in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!