Okay, not necessarily sex - but advertising does know how to make mundane things sexy.
And, at times, social media can be mundane. And, advertising (and marketing) understands how to sex-up the mundane.
So, after putting together this post, mulling it over in my mind since, I've come to some conclusions. Since
YouTube. But, the clients eat up those numbers because they expect that from advertising, and, well, advertising knows how to sell itself. Unlike PR. Oh, and that cost includes nothing on outreach - it's just production. Take a minute and think of all the bad campaigns that advertising has done in social media ... but dayum, it's slick!!
And, well, look at the past. The Web sites should have been a PR vehicle - it's communications - but we lost it to marketing. Why? Because Web sites became a vehicle for selling - only. Messaging and communications rate, at best, a distance second (after)thought.
How many corporate sites make sense, and tell the story of the company? Barely any. Why? It's because PR ignored the power of the Web early on. Now, all that marketing / advertising has to chime in with is that they already execute on the Web with the corporate site ... and they will win that sales war (and still have crappy execution, as a whole).
In social media, advertising has that Midas touch, except it turns almost everything to shit. Plus that seat at the C-suite table helps them out ... while we're stuck in the lobby, pacing like hired help.
What can PR do to win - because at the end of the day, we need to win or social media will be ruined (and we'll be blamed).
Here's my bullet-pointed plan to save PR, have a statue put up for me in New York, and be remembered like David Parmet, Constantin Basturea in NYC, Teresa Valdez Klein in Seattle, Neville Hobson, Allan Jenkins. And, go read local bar in Chicago ... think of social networks and communities as a local bar. Would you walk in there, no intro and no relationships, and start spouting off like Marshall Kirkpatrick
Large agencies are still standing, and there are people in most of them that get social media as a new skill set. It is not a replacement to other skills - but a complementary skill that is needed. Unfortunately, there are skills that are just as ignored in PR right now ... such as the simple ability of phone pitching, or writing, or providing counsel and handling a crisis. These are all skills that a good PR person should have, and include social media in there now (as the line is becoming blurred with traditional media and influence). It's why I never wanted to be characterized as a blog specialist: I'm a PR generalist that has a wide array of different skill-sets.
The reality is that it does not matter if PR, advertising and social media are all marketing communications - what matters is who is going to get control of social media, and make it right for clients and the agencies. In my view, it should be public relations because social media is very public and socially oriented. You cannot just pop in there and try to be part of the community, to never return again.
If you want to know which agencies are doing it well, well, there are a lot of them. Voce, MS&L and others ... and there are agencies that are talking about getting it, but it's a talk and no real walk.
Will social media stay with PR, or is it going to be another marketing communications discipline? I do not know - I just know that there are some things that social media needs to have for it to be transparent, honest and community-oriented. If PR jumped the gun a little earlier, there wouldn't be these specialized social media practices popping up, and we would have the advantage on advertising and marketing.
Suggest a Correction
Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.





No comments yet. Be the first to comment!