Joe Sinkwitz, also known as Cygnus, has a great post explaining how the polarized view of SEO is quite naive and inaccurate in nature. Rather than explaining SEO as black or white, a more accurate representation of the SEO market is lateral thinking. There is a Wikipedia article and are numerous books on the subject as well. How Does Lateral Thinking Apply to SEO? Common SEO lateral thinking questions:
- why the hell is that crappy site ranking (and how can I replicate the results with limited risk or effort)
- how did they get that sweet link (and how can I get similar sweet links)
- how can I make that person (or group) want to link to me (and would it be worth the associated costs)
- how can I write a second page on this topic without looking like a spammer
- is this person naive enough to link at me if I flame them? (and if I wanted to could I get that story and link equity to spread beyond that)
- when, how, and who should I ask for feedback on this project
- do I have enough brand equity to where I can be a bit more aggressive without adding much risk to my marketing
- would this link lead to secondary citations
- how can I leverage this news coverage to lead to more links
- would this link buy pass a hand check
- will more aggressive spammers find this and be able to replicate it? (if so, how long will it be before this site has its outbound link authority nuked?)
- does this page have enough authority to keep ranking even if I alter its format or purpose?
- how might people react if I buy this keyword
- how can I ensure this powerful page linking to me stays in the search index without looking like a spammer
- if I buy their stuff and leave a testimonial would they be willing to link at my site
- if I factor in the value of the testimonial link, is the site design still expensive?
- how can I spin a story so it spreads as far as possible
- how can I put a unique spin on something that is already spreading
- would posting this undermine my credibility more than it would boost my link authority
- is it worth getting this site more exposure, or will doing so drastically alter the risk reward ratio in a negative way
- is this site worth more as a link source, a credibility source, or a direct income stream? or how should I optimally mix those?
- do I have enough authority to make this local site a statewide or nationwide one? if no, what would be the cost of building that authority
- how can I relate my site to this more profitable subject without looking like a spammer Linguistics vs Profits: It doesn't really matter weather or not you are a spammer. What matters is public perception, cost (in terms of time, money, happiness, opportunity, and attention), and the risk reward ratio of any action. There are spots out there where you can get free high value links. There are spots where you can do $2 a month link buys for trusted links that do not look like link buys. There are spots that you can publish content to that will rank nearly immediately. Everything associated with SEO is margin based. What are the risks and what are the opportunity costs if I do x? If you employ lateral thinking skills your margins are typically going to be better than someone who does not.
SEOBook.com Aaron
gives away free advice and search engine optimization tools. He is a
regular conference speaker, partner in Clientside SEM, and runs the
Suggest a Correction
Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!