Today's Web startups are not entirely unlike their dot.com predecessors when it comes to the way they are thinking about making money. The differences for "Web 2.0″ type companies stem not from their preferred business models - models that are very similar to their dot.com counterparts - but in the forces influencing the implementation of those models. John Battelle made the case for Web 2.0 inaugurating the second coming of the web, the building of a better web (or more aptly, better Internet and web businesses), versus it representing an impending bubble. In his SkypeIn as examples. These revenue streams are based on a pricing point that is reasonable to a critical mass of power users, who in effect pay' for others. It is important to observe that in certain cases of the technology business model, such as Skype, network effects help drive both the adoption and value of the service. These models also enable the possibilities for MySpace, where the content' is the thousands of user profiles and in the case of syndicate their content to third-parties such as Yahoo!. For those that can sell or syndicate content (of which, MySpace and social networking sites cannot), tightly integrated are open APIs that enable click here TECHNOSIGHT blog.
Web 2.0 Business Models
0 views
Comments (0)
Please sign in to leave a comment.





No comments yet. Be the first to comment!