A recent lawsuit judgment provided evidence for two things: a blogger may qualify as a journalist; and just because you're a lawyer doesn't mean you have to act like one. Advice: being mean is no way to get through court.
Blogger (and now, journalist) Philip Smith decided he didn't like the way eBay listing company BidZirk did business* and decided to blog about it. BidZirk and its lawyer decided they didn't like what Smith said and sued him for trademark dilution, defamation, and invasion of privacy.
Trademark dilution for using the BidZirk logo; defamation for calling BidZirk owner Daniel Schmidt "a yes man"; and invasion of privacy for linking to a picture of Schmidt and his wife.
You could call him an "assbag," for example, and he would have no cause for damages of any kind. Or, for another example, you could say his lawyer seemed "rather mean and prickish," based on his actions in court, and be okay because that's an opinion.
As reported several places like Technology & Marketing Law Blog, or from
But I like Technology & Marketing Law blog author Eric Goldman's words the best, so we'll leave it at that:
I see this ruling as a redemption of sorts – it takes a lot of courage to blog, and it takes even more courage for bloggers to stand behind their words when challenged, but we have a responsibility to make sure we can't be bullied on either front. On behalf of bloggers everywhere, we applaud Philip Smith's courage and determination to defeat this case.
*Ironically, a lot more people know about the situation than did previously. If they'd left it alone, how bad could it have gotten?
Yes, Virginia, Bloggers Can Be Journalists
0 views
Comments (0)
Please sign in to leave a comment.





No comments yet. Be the first to comment!