Introduction
Cheap submission refers to the practice of providing low‑cost services that facilitate the preparation and submission of scholarly manuscripts, legal documents, patent filings, or other formal communications to external entities such as academic journals, courts, or administrative bodies. The term encompasses a range of activities, including formatting, proofreading, translation, compliance checks, and correspondence with editors or officials. While the basic goal is to reduce the financial and logistical barriers that authors and applicants face, the market for cheap submission services has evolved into a complex ecosystem involving legitimate support agencies, predatory enterprises, and regulatory interventions.
Historical Background
Early Practices in Academic Publishing
For most of the twentieth century, authors were expected to prepare their manuscripts according to the style guidelines of each target journal. This process required specialized knowledge of formatting conventions, indexing, and citation styles. In many cases, researchers relied on institutional support, such as libraries or writing centers, to meet these demands. The cost of publishing remained largely confined to the time invested by the author and the potential article processing charges (APCs) of open‑access venues.
Emergence of Professional Editing Services
The late 1990s and early 2000s witnessed the rise of commercial editing firms that offered manuscript polishing for a fee. These services were often marketed to non‑native English speakers or scholars unfamiliar with journal requirements. Their pricing varied widely, reflecting differences in editorial expertise and turnaround times. Initially, such services were considered supplementary rather than essential.
Proliferation of Low‑Cost Submissions
With the expansion of the open‑access movement and the introduction of APCs in the early 2000s, a new demand emerged for cost‑effective assistance with the entire submission process. Small‑scale academic publishing houses and independent consultants began offering bundled packages that included manuscript formatting, compliance checks, and correspondence with editors. Prices for these packages were often set below those charged by traditional editing firms, creating the label “cheap submission.” The accessibility of the internet facilitated rapid growth, as service providers could market to a global audience of researchers seeking to publish quickly and economically.
Services and Business Models
Core Offerings
Cheap submission services typically provide the following core components:
- Formatting and Style Compliance – Adjusting manuscript structure, figure placement, and reference formatting to meet target journal requirements.
- Language Editing – Proofreading, grammar correction, and stylistic refinement, often by native speakers.
- Translation – Conversion of manuscripts into English or other target languages, sometimes with a focus on preserving technical terminology.
- Compliance Verification – Ensuring adherence to ethical guidelines, conflict‑of‑interest disclosures, and data availability statements.
- Correspondence Management – Drafting cover letters, responding to reviewers, and handling communication with editorial staff.
- Submission Platform Assistance – Uploading manuscripts to journal portals, selecting appropriate categories, and managing metadata.
Pricing Structures
Businesses employ various pricing strategies to attract cost‑conscious clients:
- Flat‑Rate Packages – Fixed fees covering all services up to a certain page limit, often with optional add‑ons for additional pages or expedited delivery.
- Per‑Page or Per‑Word Charges – Fees scaled to the length of the manuscript, allowing clients to estimate costs in advance.
- Subscription Models – Monthly or annual memberships granting access to a set number of services, such as unlimited submissions or priority handling.
Operational Models
Service providers typically operate through one of the following models:
- Outsourced Editing Pools – Networks of freelance editors and translators who work remotely, enabling rapid scaling of capacity.
- In‑House Editorial Teams – Firms with dedicated staff, allowing for tighter quality control and brand consistency.
- Hybrid Approaches – Combination of in‑house oversight with external contributors to balance cost and expertise.
Market Dynamics
Demand Drivers
Several factors contribute to the demand for cheap submission services:
- Time Constraints – Researchers with tight deadlines, such as funding deadlines or conference submission windows.
- Language Barriers – Non‑native English speakers seeking to meet the linguistic standards of high‑impact journals.
- Complexity of Journal Requirements – Numerous and evolving formatting guidelines that can overwhelm authors lacking institutional support.
- Globalization of Research – Expanding participation from researchers in developing countries who may lack access to institutional editing resources.
- Open‑Access APCs – Publishers shifting costs to authors, making comprehensive submission support an attractive investment.
Competitive Landscape
The cheap submission market comprises a spectrum of providers ranging from legitimate, quality‑controlled firms to predatory entities that prioritize profit over scholarly integrity. Established firms often differentiate themselves through proven track records, transparent pricing, and demonstrable success rates in article acceptance. Predatory firms, in contrast, may employ aggressive marketing tactics, provide questionable services, or even submit manuscripts on behalf of authors without proper disclosure.
Ethical and Legal Considerations
Authorship and Authorship Fraud
Some cheap submission services have been implicated in questionable authorship practices, such as adding non‑contributing individuals to a manuscript’s author list or claiming authorship for clients. This raises ethical concerns regarding the integrity of the scholarly record and violates the policies of many journals.
Plagiarism and Duplicate Content
Due to limited resources or deliberate shortcuts, certain providers may incorporate plagiarized text or duplicate content into manuscripts. Journals increasingly employ plagiarism detection software, and manuscripts containing such violations face rejection or retraction.
Compliance with Institutional Policies
Researchers must ensure that any service they engage with complies with the policies of their home institutions, particularly concerning data management, conflict of interest, and intellectual property rights. Some institutions prohibit outsourcing of certain tasks, such as editing of core text or translation.
Legal Liability
In cases where service providers submit manuscripts without authors’ consent or submit fraudulent documents to legal or administrative bodies, legal liability may arise. Authors retain responsibility for the accuracy and authenticity of their submissions, regardless of outsourced assistance.
Regulatory Framework
Journal and Publisher Policies
Many academic publishers have issued statements regarding the use of third‑party services. For instance, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requires that all individuals who performed substantial work on a manuscript be listed as authors and that any external editing assistance be disclosed. Publishers may also prohibit the use of specific services or require the acknowledgment of editorial assistance.
Professional Association Guidelines
Editing associations, such as the Editorial Freelancers Association (EFA) and the American Medical Writers Association (AMWA), provide guidelines that emphasize ethical editing practices, conflict‑of‑interest disclosure, and adherence to journal standards. Adherence to these guidelines can serve as a quality benchmark for service providers.
Legal Regulations in Different Jurisdictions
In certain countries, laws regulate the outsourcing of editorial services, especially when the service involves the manipulation of scientific data or intellectual property. Researchers must be aware of such regulations to avoid inadvertent violations.
Impact on Scholarship
Positive Contributions
When executed responsibly, cheap submission services can enhance the visibility and dissemination of research by improving manuscript quality, ensuring compliance with journal standards, and reducing the time to publication. These benefits are particularly pronounced for early‑career researchers and scholars from resource‑constrained settings.
Negative Consequences
However, the proliferation of low‑quality services can undermine the integrity of scholarly communication. The inclusion of plagiarized material, inaccurate citations, or undisclosed editing can lead to retractions, damaged reputations, and erosion of public trust in science.
Criticism and Controversy
Predatory Practices
Academic watchdog groups have identified a subset of cheap submission services that operate on predatory models. These entities may solicit authors with vague promises of “fast‑track publication” or “guaranteed acceptance,” often providing minimal or no substantive editorial assistance. Such practices violate ethical norms and can result in the publication of substandard research.
Transparency Issues
The lack of transparency regarding the qualifications of editors, the quality of editing, and the rates for each service creates uncertainty for authors. Some providers provide generic descriptions of their editorial team, making it difficult to assess expertise.
Academic Community Response
Academic institutions, libraries, and scholarly societies have developed guidelines and informational resources to help researchers evaluate and select reputable editing services. Initiatives such as the Open Knowledge Initiative’s “Good Editing Practices” provide criteria for assessing service quality and ethical conduct.
Alternatives to Cheap Submission Services
Institutional Support Structures
Many universities and research institutions maintain writing centers, language support services, and editorial assistance programs. These services are often funded by institutional budgets or grant funds, thereby reducing the need for external cheap services.
Peer Review and Mentorship
Colleague peer‑review programs, where researchers exchange drafts for feedback, offer a low‑cost alternative that fosters scholarly collaboration and quality improvement.
Open‑Source Editing Tools
Software tools such as Grammarly, ProWritingAid, and LanguageTool provide automated grammar and style checking. While these tools do not replace human editing, they can significantly reduce the workload before professional review.
Publisher-Provided Resources
Many publishers offer author guidelines, templates, and submission checklists. Some also provide free or low‑cost editorial support for authors who meet certain criteria, such as early‑career researchers or those from low‑income countries.
Future Trends
Integration with Manuscript Management Systems
Future developments may see service providers integrating directly with journal manuscript submission platforms, enabling seamless transfer of edited manuscripts and automated compliance verification. Such integration can streamline the workflow and reduce manual errors.
Artificial Intelligence and Automated Editing
Advances in natural language processing are enabling AI‑driven editing tools that can perform tasks such as grammar correction, style consistency checks, and even structural suggestions. While AI cannot fully replicate human editorial judgment, it is likely to complement human editors and potentially lower costs.
Standardization of Quality Metrics
Efforts are underway to develop standardized metrics for evaluating editing services, such as the Editing Quality Index. Adoption of such metrics could provide authors with transparent benchmarks when selecting a service.
Regulatory Tightening
In response to concerns about predatory practices, regulatory bodies may introduce stricter licensing requirements or accreditation processes for editing firms. Compliance with such regulations could become a prerequisite for market participation.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!