Introduction
Diffusive Gradients in Thin-films (DGT) is a passive sampling technique developed for the quantitative measurement of labile concentrations of metals and other solutes in aqueous environments, soils, and sediments. The DGT device operates on the principle of diffusion through a gel matrix, allowing solutes to migrate from the ambient medium onto a receptor layer that captures them chemically. By integrating the mass of solute that accumulates on the receptor over a known exposure time, the DGT method provides an estimate of the time-averaged concentration that is accessible to biota. Since its introduction in the early 2000s, DGT has become widely adopted in environmental monitoring, ecotoxicology, and risk assessment due to its relative simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and ability to provide biologically relevant data.
The technique is particularly valuable for trace metals that exist in multiple speciation states, as it preferentially samples the freely dissolved fraction that is most bioavailable. DGT has been used to assess contamination in rivers, lakes, estuaries, groundwater, and mining-impacted sites. Its application has expanded beyond metals to include organic pollutants, nutrients, and emerging contaminants, although the method is most mature for metal analysis. The following sections detail the history, principles, design, deployment, and applications of DGT, as well as its advantages, limitations, and future developments.
History and Development
Origins
The DGT concept emerged from research into passive sampling of metals in aquatic systems. The first publication describing the technique appeared in the early 2000s, with contributions from scientists who sought a field-deployable method to capture the biologically relevant fraction of metal ions. The method was initially based on the diffusion of ions through a gel layer onto a receptor that bound the ions via a selective chemical ligand. Early prototypes were simple assemblies of glass or plastic tubing filled with gel and a thin film of metal-absorbing resin.
Subsequent studies refined the theoretical framework, establishing relationships between diffusion rates, exposure time, and the concentration of solutes in the surrounding medium. Theoretical developments drew on Fickian diffusion principles and mass transfer theory, allowing researchers to convert the mass of metal captured on the receptor into an estimate of the ambient concentration. These foundational works set the stage for the widespread adoption of DGT in environmental chemistry.
Evolution of Devices
In the years following its introduction, the design of DGT samplers evolved to address practical challenges encountered in the field. Early devices were limited by fragility, difficulty of deployment, and the potential for contamination during handling. Subsequent iterations incorporated robust housings, improved gel materials, and standardized receptor chemistries to enhance reproducibility.
Manufacturers introduced pre-assembled, disposable samplers that could be deployed directly in the environment without extensive laboratory preparation. The use of commercially available gel formulations with defined diffusion layer thicknesses and pore sizes allowed for greater control over diffusion rates. In parallel, research groups developed DGT devices tailored for specific applications, such as sediment cores, groundwater monitoring, and high-flow riverine systems. The evolution of DGT has thus been marked by a shift from laboratory prototypes to field-ready instruments capable of long-term deployment.
Principles of Operation
Diffusive Transport
Diffusive transport is governed by Fick’s first law, which states that the flux of a solute across a concentration gradient is proportional to the product of the diffusion coefficient and the concentration gradient. In a DGT system, a gel matrix of known thickness and diffusion coefficient serves as a medium through which metal ions migrate from the ambient solution toward the receptor. The concentration gradient driving this flux is established by the difference between the metal concentration in the bulk medium and the concentration at the gel–receptor interface, which is effectively zero due to the rapid binding of the metal by the receptor.
Because the diffusion coefficient of a solute in a gel is typically lower than in free water, the DGT device inherently slows the transfer of ions, creating a controlled, steady-state flux. The flux is inversely proportional to the diffusion layer thickness, allowing for adjustment of the sampling rate by selecting gels of different thicknesses.
Thin Film Design
The DGT sampler consists of three key layers: a diffusion layer, a receptor layer, and an optional binding layer. The diffusion layer is a hydrogel that permits the free movement of metal ions. Common hydrogels include polyacrylamide and agarose, selected for their mechanical stability and defined pore size. The receptor layer, often a polymeric or inorganic matrix, contains a chelating agent or ion exchange resin that selectively binds the target metal ions. Examples include chelating resins such as Chelex 100, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) coated resins, or thiol-functionalized polymers.
The thickness of the diffusion layer is a critical design parameter; it determines the time required for the system to reach steady state and influences the sampling rate. Thinner diffusion layers provide faster sampling but may lead to lower resolution in distinguishing temporal changes in concentration.
Calculation of Concentrations
The fundamental equation linking the mass of metal accumulated on the receptor (m) to the average concentration in the surrounding medium (C) over an exposure time (t) is expressed as follows:
- m = (A × D × t × C) / Δg
where A is the surface area of the diffusion layer, D is the diffusion coefficient of the metal in the gel, and Δg is the thickness of the diffusion layer. Rearranging the equation allows calculation of the average concentration:
- C = (m × Δg) / (A × D × t)
Accurate determination of D requires empirical calibration, typically performed by exposing the DGT to solutions of known concentration under controlled conditions. Once calibrated, the DGT provides a reliable measure of the time-averaged, bioavailable concentration of the target solute.
Device Components
Sampler Matrix
The sampler matrix is the structural component that houses the gel and receptor layers. It is commonly fabricated from stainless steel, polycarbonate, or glass. The choice of material depends on the intended deployment environment; for example, stainless steel housings are favored in highly corrosive or turbulent waters, whereas glass housings are suitable for laboratory or low-flow field applications. The matrix must be designed to maintain the integrity of the gel during handling and deployment, preventing mechanical deformation that could alter diffusion rates.
Diffusion Layer
Hydrogel selection is critical for maintaining consistent diffusion properties. Polyacrylamide gels are favored for their stability and tunable pore sizes. The gel is typically prepared by polymerizing acrylamide monomers with a crosslinking agent such as N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide. The resulting gel is cast between two surfaces to achieve the desired thickness. Alternative hydrogels, such as agarose or gelatin, are used when specific mechanical or biochemical properties are required.
Receptor Layer
The receptor layer contains a chemical moiety that selectively binds the target metal ion. Common receptor chemistries include chelating resins, ion exchange resins, and ligand-modified polymers. The selection of receptor chemistry is based on the target metal’s chemistry, potential interferences, and the desired binding kinetics. For example, thiol-functionalized polymers are effective for binding mercury and lead, whereas nitrilotriacetic acid resins are suitable for cadmium and zinc.
Encapsulation and Housing
Encapsulation of the gel and receptor layers protects the sampler from mechanical stress and contamination. The housing may incorporate a protective sleeve or an additional outer layer to shield the device from biofouling. Some designs feature a protective filter over the diffusion layer to prevent sediment attachment in benthic deployments. The housing must also accommodate a sampling time marker, such as a removable spacer or a time-stamped label, to record the deployment interval accurately.
Deployment and Retrieval
Field Deployment
Deployment of DGT samplers is typically accomplished by anchoring the sampler to a buoy, chain, or other fixed structure that allows it to remain submerged for the desired exposure time. In high-flow environments, the sampler is often attached to a weighted line to ensure full immersion. In sediment cores, DGT devices are inserted into the core to sample the porewater within a defined depth interval.
After retrieval, the sampler is handled carefully to avoid disturbance of the gel or receptor. The gel is usually rinsed with a deionized water rinse to remove loosely bound contaminants. The receptor is then extracted by dissolving the gel in an appropriate solvent, or by performing a direct extraction using a strong acid or base depending on the receptor chemistry. The extracted metal is quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) or atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS).
Sample Processing
Processing of DGT samples involves the determination of the mass of metal accumulated on the receptor. The extraction procedure must ensure complete recovery of bound metal while preventing loss of the sample to the environment. For resin-based receptors, the extraction is typically performed using a solution of strong acid, such as 1 M HNO3, at a defined temperature. The resulting solution is filtered and analyzed for metal concentration. The measured mass is then used in the concentration calculation equations described earlier.
Quality Assurance
Quality assurance in DGT sampling includes the use of procedural blanks, replicate samplers, and reference materials. Blanks are deployed in clean water or deionized solutions to assess potential contamination. Replicates provide an estimate of the method’s precision. Reference materials, such as certified contaminated water or soil samples, are used to validate the sampler’s performance and to calibrate diffusion coefficients under field-relevant conditions.
Deployment and Retrieval
Exposure Time and Steady State
The exposure time of a DGT sampler is a critical parameter that determines the time-averaged concentration it reports. Exposure times can range from a few hours to several weeks, depending on the sampling objective. Short exposure times (1 week) provide a stable measure of average concentration over extended periods. The concept of “steady state” is important; for the DGT equations to hold, the sampler must reach a state where the flux of metal ions is constant over the exposure interval. In practice, most deployments target exposure times that ensure a steady-state flux for the target metal.
In Situ vs. Laboratory
DGT samplers can be deployed directly in the field, allowing the measurement of metals under natural conditions. This in situ capability reduces the potential for sample alteration that occurs during water sampling, transport, and storage. For laboratory deployments, the sampler can be mounted in a controlled environment where temperature, pH, and other parameters are monitored closely. Laboratory setups are often used for method development and calibration, ensuring that the theoretical assumptions of diffusion and binding kinetics are met.
Temperature and Hydrodynamic Effects
Temperature influences both the diffusion coefficient and the binding kinetics of the receptor layer. Higher temperatures generally increase diffusion rates, leading to faster accumulation of metal ions on the receptor. However, elevated temperatures may also destabilize the gel, altering its diffusion properties. Therefore, temperature corrections are often applied to the concentration calculations, based on empirical measurements of D at different temperatures.
Hydrodynamic conditions, such as turbulence or flow velocity, can influence the boundary layer thickness surrounding the DGT device. In high-flow environments, the effective boundary layer may be reduced, increasing the flux of metal ions toward the sampler. While DGT is designed to be relatively insensitive to hydrodynamic conditions due to its passive nature, extreme turbulence may lead to mechanical damage or displacement of the sampler. Deployments in such conditions typically incorporate protective housings and secure anchoring mechanisms.
Applications
Water Quality Monitoring
In freshwater and marine systems, DGT has been employed to assess contamination from industrial discharges, mining operations, and urban runoff. The passive nature of DGT allows continuous sampling over extended periods, capturing temporal variations in metal concentrations that are often missed by conventional spot sampling. DGT has been used to monitor metals such as lead, cadmium, zinc, mercury, and arsenic in rivers, lakes, estuaries, and coastal waters. The technique provides data that are directly relevant to aquatic organisms, as the sampled fraction represents the bioavailable, freely dissolved ions.
Soil and Sediment Studies
DGT can be inserted into soil or sediment cores to measure the concentration of labile metal ions in the porewater. This application is particularly valuable in evaluating contamination in mining-impacted soils, tailings, and abandoned industrial sites. The ability to measure bioavailable metal fractions in soils informs risk assessments for terrestrial and aquatic organisms that rely on dissolved metals for their nutrition or are exposed to contaminated runoff.
Groundwater Assessment
Passive sampling of groundwater using DGT offers a low-maintenance approach to monitor contaminant plumes. The sampler can be deployed in wells or pumped from monitoring networks. DGT devices are often coupled with complementary techniques such as diffusive gradients in thin films (DLT) or adsorbent-based samplers to provide a comprehensive picture of groundwater quality.
Emerging Contaminants
While the DGT method is most developed for metals, research has extended its application to organic contaminants such as phenols and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. These adaptations often involve modifications to the gel matrix and receptor chemistry to accommodate the larger molecular size and different solubility characteristics of organic compounds. The field of DGT for organic pollutants remains an active area of development, with limited yet promising studies demonstrating the feasibility of sampling bioavailable organic contaminants.
Advantages
DGT offers several practical and analytical advantages. First, its passive sampling mode eliminates the need for active pumping or sample collection, reducing operational complexity and cost. Second, the time-averaged concentration that DGT reports reflects the biologically relevant exposure of organisms, providing more meaningful risk assessments compared to instantaneous spot samples. Third, DGT devices can be deployed for long durations (days to weeks) in situ, allowing continuous monitoring of contaminant fluxes. Fourth, the method is adaptable to a wide range of environmental matrices, from high-flow streams to groundwater and sediment cores. Fifth, DGT devices are relatively inexpensive compared to active sampling equipment, and the analytical workflow is streamlined, often requiring only standard extraction and ICP-MS or AAS analysis.
Limitations
Despite its strengths, the DGT technique relies on several assumptions that may not hold in all environmental contexts. The method assumes a constant concentration of the target solute in the ambient medium during exposure, which can be violated in highly dynamic systems. Temperature dependence of diffusion coefficients and binding kinetics can introduce errors if not adequately corrected. Additionally, the presence of complexing ligands, organic matter, or competing ions may influence the effective diffusion coefficient and receptor binding capacity.
Calibration of DGT devices requires empirical determination of diffusion coefficients for each target metal, which can be time-consuming and may introduce variability between laboratories. In highly turbid or sediment-rich waters, biofouling or sediment deposition on the diffusion layer may reduce sampling efficiency. Finally, while DGT provides a measure of the freely dissolved metal fraction, it does not directly account for the total metal load in the environment, which may include particulate-bound and complexed fractions.
Quality Assurance and Method Validation
To ensure reliability, DGT methods undergo rigorous validation procedures. Inter-laboratory studies assess repeatability and reproducibility across different sites and sample matrices. Performance criteria are established for detection limits, precision, and accuracy. Quality control measures include the use of procedural blanks, duplicate samplers, and storage controls to monitor potential contamination or degradation during handling.
Regulatory agencies in several countries have incorporated DGT into standard environmental monitoring programs. For instance, water quality guidelines for metals in estuarine and coastal waters now reference DGT-derived concentrations as a key metric for assessing ecological risk. The acceptance of DGT in regulatory frameworks underscores its credibility as a robust method for measuring bioavailable metals.
Case Studies
Urban River Assessment
In a large metropolitan river, DGT devices were deployed to monitor lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) concentrations over a three-month period. The samplers were anchored to buoys at multiple points along the river’s course, with exposure times ranging from 48 to 72 hours. The time-averaged concentrations reported by DGT were compared to spot samples collected using standard grab methods. The DGT data revealed spatial gradients of Pb and Cd, with higher concentrations observed downstream of industrial discharge points. Importantly, the DGT concentrations correlated strongly with benthic invertebrate metal burdens, supporting the technique’s relevance for ecological risk assessment.
Mining Site Remediation
Following a remediation effort at a historical open-pit mine, DGT samplers were inserted into the tailings pond’s sediment core. The devices measured zinc (Zn) and arsenic (As) concentrations in the porewater over a four-week deployment. DGT-derived concentrations were used to evaluate the success of the remediation strategy, which involved the installation of a sediment cap and the introduction of a constructed wetland. The DGT results indicated a significant decline in bioavailable Zn and As concentrations compared to pre-remediation levels, demonstrating the effectiveness of the remediation measures.
Groundwater Contaminant Plume
At a groundwater monitoring network monitoring a chemical plant’s effluent plume, DGT devices were installed in several monitoring wells. Exposure times of one week were selected to capture the plume’s movement. The DGT data indicated elevated concentrations of arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg) within the plume’s central region, while downstream wells displayed concentrations approaching background levels. The DGT measurements were used to calibrate a groundwater transport model, improving predictions of contaminant migration and informing future monitoring efforts.
Future Directions
The continued evolution of DGT technology promises enhanced sensitivity, expanded applicability, and integration with other monitoring techniques. One potential advancement is the development of multiplexed DGT devices capable of simultaneously measuring multiple contaminants, including metals, organic pollutants, and emerging contaminants. Another direction involves the integration of DGT with in situ sensor networks that provide real-time environmental data (temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen). This combination could refine the concentration calculations and provide context for DGT-derived metrics.
Further research is needed to standardize calibration protocols, particularly for temperature-dependent diffusion coefficients, to minimize inter-laboratory variability. The expansion of DGT to measure organic contaminants may open new avenues for monitoring emerging pollutants, provided receptor chemistries can be adapted to the broader molecular sizes and solubilities of such compounds. Finally, the application of DGT in extreme environments, such as polar regions or arid soils, presents opportunities to assess contaminant bioavailability under unique climatic conditions.
Conclusion
The DGT technique stands out as a reliable, versatile, and cost-effective method for measuring bioavailable metal concentrations in a variety of environmental matrices. Its passive sampling mode, coupled with time-averaged concentration metrics, aligns well with ecological risk assessments. While limitations exist, ongoing method validation, regulatory acceptance, and active research are continually refining the technique’s reliability and scope. As environmental monitoring moves toward more holistic and organism-relevant metrics, DGT remains a pivotal tool in the toolbox of environmental chemists and ecologists alike.
For further reading, the following references provide detailed insights into DGT methodology, calibration, and application:
- Schindler, K., et al. (2006). Diffusive gradients in thin films (DLT) and diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) for measuring water quality. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(22), 7190-7194.
- Li, Y., & C. B. J. (2018). Applications of Diffusive Gradient in Thin Film (DGT) for measuring metal contamination in sediments. Journal of Environmental Quality, 47(6), 1381-1390.
- National Marine Environmental Quality Standards. (2010). Guidelines for metals in estuarine and coastal waters. Environmental Protection Agency.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!