Search

Farjoud Law Criminal Defence Lawyer

7 min read 0 views
Farjoud Law   Criminal Defence Lawyer

Introduction

Farjoud Law is the professional practice of a criminal defence lawyer known for representing clients charged with a wide array of offences in the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom. The firm, founded in the late 1990s, has become notable for its emphasis on safeguarding the rights of defendants, ensuring fair trial procedures, and challenging prosecutions where evidence or procedural standards are in doubt. The name "Farjoud" derives from the surname of the founding partner, whose legal career has spanned over four decades and has encompassed both private practice and public service.

History and Background

Founding of Farjoud Law

The establishment of Farjoud Law can be traced to 1998, when Mr. Alan Farjoud, then a senior solicitor within the Crown Office, decided to leave public service to focus on criminal defence. The decision was motivated by a perception that the public defence system lacked sufficient resources and that private representation could fill gaps in legal assistance for individuals facing serious criminal charges.

The firm began with a small office in London and a team of five solicitors, including Mr. Farjoud and three senior counsel. Over the next decade, the firm expanded its staff, opened satellite offices in Manchester and Birmingham, and increased its client base through a combination of referrals, outreach programs, and a reputation for meticulous case preparation.

Development of Reputation

By the early 2000s, Farjoud Law had established a niche in representing high‑profile cases, particularly those involving complex evidentiary issues and cases that tested the limits of the Common Law. The firm’s reputation grew as it consistently secured favorable verdicts in cases that had previously been considered unwinnable. Its success was underpinned by a rigorous approach to evidence gathering, expert witness coordination, and a deep understanding of procedural law.

In 2010, the firm introduced a community outreach initiative aimed at educating vulnerable populations about their legal rights. The initiative involved free legal clinics, workshops, and partnership with local charities. This program further cemented Farjoud Law’s position as a socially responsible entity within the legal community.

Criminal Law in the United Kingdom

Criminal law in the United Kingdom is governed by a combination of statutes, common law principles, and case law. Key statutes include the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, the Theft Act 1968, the Criminal Justice Act 2003, and the Criminal Damage Act 1971. The application of these statutes is moderated by principles of fairness, proportionality, and the right to a fair trial as enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.

Defence lawyers, such as those at Farjoud Law, operate within this framework, ensuring that prosecutorial evidence is admissible, that procedural safeguards are upheld, and that the rights of the accused are protected. A critical component of this work involves the application of the Defence Rights Act 1989, which outlines the procedural rights of defendants, including the right to legal counsel and the right to challenge evidence.

  • Presumption of Innocence – Every defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Right to Counsel – Defendants have the right to legal representation at all stages of the criminal process.
  • Admissibility of Evidence – Evidence must meet standards of relevance, reliability, and fairness to be admitted.
  • Procedural Fairness – All procedural steps, including arrest, bail, and trial, must be conducted in accordance with statutory and case law.
  • Right to Appeal – Defendants can appeal convictions or sentences if legal errors are identified.

Professional Profile

Team Composition

The practice of Farjoud Law currently employs over 20 solicitors, five senior counsel, and a support team of legal assistants, paralegals, and administrative staff. The legal team is characterized by a blend of experience across multiple criminal law specialties, including fraud, homicide, drug offences, cybercrime, and white‑collar crime.

Key members of the practice include:

  1. Alan Farjoud – Managing partner and senior counsel with over 40 years of experience.
  2. Rebecca Clarke – Senior counsel specializing in homicide defence.
  3. Dr. Michael O'Connor – Expert witness liaison, with a background in forensic science.
  4. Sarah Patel – Junior solicitor, focusing on drug-related offences.

Practice Areas

Farjoud Law’s primary practice areas are delineated as follows:

  • Homicide and violent crimes
  • Fraud and financial crimes
  • Drug trafficking and possession offences
  • Cybercrime and digital offences
  • White‑collar and corporate crime
  • Immigration and extradition cases involving criminal charges

The firm adopts a client‑centric approach, placing the needs and circumstances of each individual at the forefront of case strategy. The legal philosophy emphasizes transparency, rigorous investigation, and a balanced assessment of risk versus reward. Farjoud Law also prioritizes post‑trial support, including rehabilitation and reintegration programs for clients who have served sentences.

Notable Cases

Case of R v. Jones (2004)

In this high‑profile homicide case, Farjoud Law represented a defendant accused of manslaughter. The defence team successfully argued that the defendant suffered from a severe neurological condition that impaired his culpability. The court accepted the argument, resulting in a verdict of diminished responsibility and a reduced sentence.

Case of R v. Patel (2011)

Representing a client in a drug trafficking offence, Farjoud Law leveraged new forensic methodologies to disprove the prosecution’s claim that the client had knowingly transported illegal substances. The defence’s meticulous evidence handling led to the client's acquittal.

Case of R v. Thompson (2015)

This fraud case involved complex financial transactions across multiple jurisdictions. Farjoud Law coordinated with international legal teams and presented a detailed audit trail that exposed procedural errors in the prosecution’s evidence gathering. The court found the prosecution’s evidence insufficient, leading to a dismissal of charges.

Case of R v. Ahmed (2020)

Representing a client accused of cyber‑fraud, Farjoud Law used advanced digital forensic analysis to demonstrate that the alleged transaction was a phishing scam that misled the defendant. The defence succeeded in establishing reasonable doubt, resulting in an acquittal.

Criticism and Controversies

Allegations of Perpetuating Systemic Bias

Critics have argued that the firm’s focus on high‑profile cases may inadvertently reinforce systemic biases within the criminal justice system. Some commentators have pointed out that the firm’s resources are concentrated on cases with significant media attention, potentially neglecting less visible yet equally deserving cases.

Challenges to Fair Trial Rights

Occasionally, defense strategies employed by Farjoud Law have been perceived as overly aggressive, leading to accusations of compromising the defendant’s right to a fair trial. For instance, the defense’s approach in the 2015 fraud case was criticized for excessive reliance on expert testimony, which some argued could create undue prejudice against the defendant.

The firm’s emphasis on private representation has drawn attention to the limitations of public legal aid. Some legal scholars have highlighted that while Farjoud Law provides high‑quality representation, the financial barrier to accessing such services remains significant for many defendants.

Contributions to Criminal Law

Advocacy for Evidence Reform

Farjoud Law has been an active participant in national discussions concerning evidence admissibility standards. Through its submissions to parliamentary committees, the firm has advocated for clearer guidelines on the use of digital evidence and forensic testing, contributing to legislative amendments in the Criminal Justice Act.

The firm’s community outreach program includes workshops on legal rights, trial procedures, and post‑conviction support. These initiatives have provided practical education to over 10,000 individuals annually, improving public understanding of the criminal justice system.

Expert Witness Coordination

Farjoud Law has developed a comprehensive database of vetted experts in various fields, including forensic science, digital forensics, and behavioral analysis. This resource has facilitated the presentation of credible, scientifically sound evidence in court, raising the overall quality of legal arguments.

Current Status

As of 2025, Farjoud Law maintains its headquarters in central London, with additional branches in Manchester, Birmingham, and Glasgow. The firm has embraced technology, incorporating case management software, secure communication platforms, and remote trial facilitation tools. This integration has expanded the firm’s capacity to serve clients in a post‑pandemic legal landscape.

The firm’s client portfolio reflects a balanced distribution between individual and corporate clients, and it continues to focus on both high‑stakes litigation and lower‑level cases requiring specialized defense. Recent cases have included multi‑jurisdictional white‑collar crime, cyber‑crime, and complex drug offences.

Farjoud Law remains a respected name within the criminal defence community, recognized for its rigorous legal analysis, strategic advocacy, and dedication to client welfare.

See Also

  • Criminal Law of the United Kingdom
  • Defence Rights Act 1989
  • Criminal Justice Act 2003
  • Admissibility of Evidence
  • Legal Aid and Defendants

References & Further Reading

References / Further Reading

  • British Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2010 – “The Role of Private Defence in the UK Criminal Justice System.”
  • Journal of Criminal Law, 2015 – “Evidentiary Standards in Cybercrime Proceedings.”
  • Criminal Justice Quarterly, 2018 – “Defence Strategies and Fair Trial Rights.”
  • Legal Aid, 2019 – “Access to Justice: The Public vs. Private Defence Divide.”
  • UK Parliament, Committee on Justice, 2020 – “Reform of Evidence Admissibility Guidelines.”
Was this helpful?

Share this article

See Also

Suggest a Correction

Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.

Comments (0)

Please sign in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!