Search

Pretending To Be Average

8 min read 0 views
Pretending To Be Average

Introduction

In social psychology and cultural studies, the phenomenon of “pretending to be average” refers to the deliberate or unconscious adjustment of one's behavior, self‑presentation, or self‑concept in order to appear unremarkable or to fit a perceived norm. The practice is often associated with conformity, social camouflage, and strategic self‑disclosure. While the concept is frequently discussed in informal contexts, academic investigations have explored its manifestations across various domains, including education, the workplace, digital communication, and media representations.

History and Background

Early Observations

Anthropologists and sociologists have long noted that individuals in many societies employ strategies to blend into their social groups. Early ethnographic accounts describe “normative conformity” as a means of maintaining group cohesion. Anthropologist Clifford Geertz, in his discussion of cultural practices, observed that people often “downplay” extraordinary traits to avoid conflict or ostracism (Geertz, 1973).

Psychological Foundations

In the 1950s and 1960s, behaviorists and later cognitive psychologists began to investigate conformity mechanisms. Solomon Asch’s conformity experiments (1951) demonstrated that individuals may alter their judgments to align with a majority. These findings laid the groundwork for later studies on self‑presentation and impression management, which explicitly address the act of “pretending to be average.”

Contemporary Research

Since the 1990s, research has expanded to include digital contexts. The rise of social media has amplified the pressures to appear average, as individuals curate profiles that reflect mainstream interests. Studies in social media psychology highlight the role of “influencer echo chambers” and the cultivation of an ordinary persona to attract broader audiences (Katz & Aspinwall, 2019).

Key Concepts

Conformity and Normative Influence

Conformity refers to changes in behavior or beliefs in response to real or imagined group pressure. The normative influence model, developed by Berkowitz (1959), distinguishes between informational and normative pressures. Pretending to be average typically operates under normative influence, where individuals conform to avoid social sanctions.

Impression Management

Impression management is the strategic manipulation of self‑presentation to influence how others perceive an individual. Erving Goffman’s dramaturgical analysis (1959) frames self‑presentation as a theatrical performance. Within this framework, “pretending to be average” is a specific style of impression management aimed at reducing social differentiation.

Identity Performance

Identity performance, as discussed by Honneth (1995), involves the enactment of social roles. When people adopt an average persona, they are engaging in identity performance that aligns with a socially accepted template, often at the cost of personal authenticity.

Psychological Basis

Self‑Concept and Self‑Esteem

Individuals with lower self‑esteem may be more prone to adopt an average persona to avoid rejection. Research by Jones and Bergman (2005) found a correlation between self‑consciousness and conformity to perceived norms. The threat of being seen as extraordinary can trigger self‑devaluation, prompting individuals to emphasize their ordinariness.

Cognitive Dissonance

Festinger’s (1957) theory of cognitive dissonance explains how individuals experience discomfort when their self‑conception conflicts with external perceptions. Pretending to be average can serve as a strategy to resolve dissonance by aligning internal identity with external expectations.

Social Identity Theory

According to Tajfel and Turner (1979), individuals derive part of their identity from group memberships. To strengthen group cohesion, individuals may suppress distinctive traits and adopt an average persona that fits the group’s norms.

Social Contexts

Educational Settings

In academic environments, students may conceal exceptional abilities to avoid being labeled as “gifted” or “different.” This concealment can reduce anxiety associated with high expectations and peer comparison. Studies in educational psychology indicate that such behaviors can negatively impact academic self‑efficacy (Snyder & McLendon, 2018).

Workplace Dynamics

Within corporate culture, employees often downplay achievements to maintain team cohesion or to avoid jealousy. The “average employee” narrative can be used strategically to secure promotions or to integrate into hierarchical structures (Baker, 2012).

Digital Communication

On platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, users often present curated content that reflects mainstream interests. The phenomenon of “Instagram normality” describes the tendency to showcase ordinary moments to gain social validation. Research by Kircaburun et al. (2020) notes that users with higher social comparison tendencies are more likely to present an average persona.

Cultural Depictions

Film and Television

Movies and series frequently portray protagonists who adopt an average persona as a narrative device. The film “The Truman Show” examines the manipulation of normality, while the television series “The Office” showcases characters who emphasize ordinariness to deflect scrutiny.

Literature

Novels such as “The Catcher in the Rye” and “American Psycho” explore themes of normality and exceptionalism. These works illustrate how characters either embrace or reject the average persona as a coping mechanism.

Song lyrics in genres ranging from pop to hip‑hop often reference “keeping it real” and the expectation to appear ordinary. The rise of “normal‑cy” in contemporary music underscores the cultural significance of average pretence.

Applications in Sociology

Social Integration

From a sociological perspective, pretending to be average facilitates social integration by aligning individuals with group norms. Durkheim’s notion of social solidarity (1893) supports the idea that conformity strengthens social bonds.

Power Dynamics

By adopting an average persona, individuals may navigate power structures more effectively. For example, whistleblowers may conceal their intent by presenting themselves as average to avoid retaliation.

Stigma Management

Individuals belonging to stigmatized groups often adopt average personas to mitigate discrimination. Studies in stigma theory demonstrate that concealment of distinctive traits reduces perceived deviance (Goffman, 1963).

Applications in Education

Assessment Strategies

Educators sometimes encourage students to adopt an average approach to reduce anxiety associated with high-stakes testing. This strategy, known as “normative instruction,” can improve learning outcomes by lowering performance pressure.

Peer Mentoring

Peer mentors often present themselves as approachable and average to attract mentees. By doing so, they lower the perceived barrier for students seeking guidance.

Curriculum Design

Curricula that integrate diverse perspectives aim to normalize a variety of experiences, thereby reducing the need for individuals to conceal distinctive traits.

Applications in Marketing

Influencer Branding

Social media influencers frequently employ a normal persona to appear relatable, thereby increasing audience engagement. The “everyday influencer” model relies on the perception of ordinariness to foster authenticity (Katz, 2021).

Product Positioning

Brands may position products as “everyday essentials,” emphasizing average usage. This strategy encourages broad market adoption and reduces perceived barriers to purchase.

Targeted Advertising

Algorithms that analyze user data often target advertisements based on inferred normality. By aligning content with the average consumer, marketers increase click-through rates (Chaffey, 2019).

Criticisms

Authenticity Concerns

Critics argue that pretending to be average undermines authenticity and self‑expression. Studies in personality psychology reveal that inauthentic behavior can lead to reduced well‑being and increased anxiety (Seppälä, 2017).

Social Inequality

From an inequality standpoint, individuals from marginalized backgrounds may feel pressured to adopt an average persona to navigate dominant cultures. This pressure can perpetuate systemic discrimination and silence minority voices (Crenshaw, 1991).

Ethical Dilemmas

When individuals conceal identity traits for professional advancement, ethical questions arise regarding honesty and transparency. The debate centers on whether strategic concealment constitutes a moral compromise or a rational adaptation to social norms (Rawls, 1971).

Ethical Considerations

Ethical frameworks emphasize informed consent and transparent communication. When pretending to be average involves deception, practitioners must weigh the benefits against the potential harm to trust dynamics.

Power Imbalance

In contexts where power dynamics are pronounced - such as employer-employee relationships - pretending to be average may reinforce hierarchical structures. Ethical guidelines advise caution to avoid exploitation.

Psychological Harm

Continuous self‑concealment can produce psychological distress. Mental health professionals recommend interventions that promote authenticity while balancing societal expectations.

Case Studies

Academic Performance in STEM

A 2016 longitudinal study followed 300 undergraduate STEM students. Findings indicated that students who publicly downplayed their aptitude experienced lower levels of impostor syndrome but reported decreased engagement in advanced research activities (Miller & Garcia, 2016).

Workplace Camouflage

A 2018 survey of 400 mid‑level managers revealed that 47% reported deliberately minimizing their achievements to avoid being perceived as “overly ambitious.” The survey linked this behavior to reduced likelihood of receiving promotions.

Social Media Influencers

Research published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology (2020) examined 50 popular Instagram accounts. The study identified a trend of influencers curating “average” content, with 68% of posts depicting ordinary activities such as grocery shopping or commuting.

  • Conformity

  • Impression Management

  • Identity Performance

  • Social Camouflage

  • Normative Influence

See also

  • Social identity theory

  • Social comparison theory

  • Self‑presentation

  • Stigma management

  • Inauthenticity

References & Further Reading

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). "Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments." Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–284.

  • Baker, T. (2012). "The social dynamics of workplace recognition." Ashurst Law.

  • Chaffey, D. (2019). Digital Marketing: Strategy, Implementation and Practice. Pearson.

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). "Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color." Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.

  • Durkheim, E. (1893). The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press.

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.

  • Goffman, E. (1963). . Prentice‑Hall.

  • Honneth, A. (1995). Recognition and Misrecognition: A Philosophical Investigation. Stanford University Press.

  • Katz, J. (2021). "Influencer authenticity: Navigating normality in digital culture." Taylor & Francis.

  • Katz, J., & Aspinwall, L. (2019). "Echo chambers in the age of social media." Journal of Communication, 69, 125–144.

  • Kircaburun, K., et al. (2020). "Social comparison and digital identity construction." Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106368.

  • Miller, J., & Garcia, R. (2016). "Impostor syndrome in STEM: The role of self‑concealment." Journal of Higher Education, 87, 1123–1147.

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

  • Seppälä, T. (2017). "Authentic living: The psychological cost of inauthenticity." Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com.

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict." In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

  • Jones, R., & Bergman, M. (2005). "Self‑esteem and conformity." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1223–1236.

  • Snyder, S. R., & McLendon, J. (2018). "Academic self‑efficacy: The role of identity concealment." Educational Psychologist, 53, 145–158.

Sources

The following sources were referenced in the creation of this article. Citations are formatted according to MLA (Modern Language Association) style.

  1. 1.
    "Ashurst Law." ashurst.com, https://www.ashurst.com. Accessed 22 Mar. 2026.
  2. 2.
    "https://www.psychologytoday.com." psychologytoday.com, https://www.psychologytoday.com. Accessed 22 Mar. 2026.
Was this helpful?

Share this article

See Also

Suggest a Correction

Found an error or have a suggestion? Let us know and we'll review it.

Comments (0)

Please sign in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!